“The way to get started is to quit talking and begin doing.”
-—Walt Disney, Disney founder
General Requirements (takes about 5-minutes or less to apply online)
680 FICO score (Transunion or Experian FICO model 8.0 or similar)
Less than -15% operating loss in the last year of business
Last 2-Years of filed Business Tax Returns; Last 1-Year of filed Personal Tax Returns
Last 3-months of bank statements; copy of Driver’s License
Out-of-Court Business Restructuring and Reorganization
Businesses inevitably encounter periods of financial or operational stress.
Whether due to market shifts, operational inefficiencies, excessive debt, or unforeseen events, these challenges are a reality of the commercial landscape.
The key to navigating these turbulent times lies in recognizing the warning signs early and taking proactive, strategic action.
For companies facing such difficulties, the prospect of formal bankruptcy proceedings can be daunting, often perceived as a last resort associated with significant costs, public scrutiny, and loss of control.
Out-of-Court Restructuring: WORKOUT
However, there exists a viable, often preferable, alternative: out-of-court restructuring, commonly referred to as a "workout."
This is a strategic, voluntary process undertaken directly between a company and its key creditors to resolve financial difficulties outside the formal bankruptcy system.
The fundamental goal is to modify the company's financial obligations, and potentially its operations, in a way that allows it to overcome its current challenges, stabilize its finances, and continue operating as a viable business – a "going concern".
It's about collaboratively finding a path back to profitability and long-term stability.
This article serves as a practical guide for business owners considering their options when faced with financial distress.
It will define out-of-court restructuring, identify the signals that might indicate a need for it, detail the operational and financial strategies involved, outline the typical process, analyze the significant advantages and potential risks, and underscore the critical importance of seeking expert professional advice
Understanding Out-of-Court Restructuring (“Workouts”)
(1) Defining the Workout
An out-of-court restructuring, or "workout," is fundamentally a contractual agreement negotiated between a financially distressed company and its key creditors – typically secured lenders like banks, but potentially also major unsecured creditors such as critical suppliers.
It involves modifying the company's debt obligations and sometimes its operational activities without resorting to formal court supervision.
It represents a collaborative attempt to resolve financial distress and insolvency concerns before they escalate to formal proceedings.
The primary goals of a workout are multi-faceted but center on rescuing the business.
Key objectives include remedying the immediate financial distress, avoiding the significant costs and public exposure of formal bankruptcy, and preventing potential liquidation.
Ultimately, the aim is to restore the business to a viable "going-concern" status, allowing it to continue operations sustainably.
This often involves preserving the inherent value of the business and establishing a clear plan towards renewed financial stability and profitability.
A core technical objective is often to "right-size the balance sheet," meaning adjusting the company's debt levels to be more manageable relative to its earnings capacity and asset values.
Contrast with Formal Bankruptcy (Chapter 11)
Understanding the workout requires contrasting it with its primary alternative, Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization. The differences are significant:
Court Involvement: Workouts are informal, private negotiations conducted directly between the company and its creditors. There is no judicial oversight, no appointed judge, and no U.S. Trustee involved. Chapter 11, conversely, is a formal, public legal process supervised by a bankruptcy court, governed by specific rules, procedures, mandatory filings, and requiring court approvals for major decisions.
Cost: Workouts are generally significantly less expensive. They avoid the substantial court costs, administrative fees, and often extensive professional fees (legal, financial advisory) associated with Chapter 11 proceedings.
Speed: Workouts can often be concluded much more quickly than Chapter 11 cases. A workout might take six to nine months, sometimes less, whereas a traditional Chapter 11 can easily extend nine to twelve months or significantly longer due to court processes and procedures. (Note: "Pre-packaged" bankruptcies, where a plan is negotiated before filing, aim to drastically shorten the time spent in court ).
Publicity/Confidentiality: Workouts are conducted privately. This confidentiality minimizes public scrutiny, protects the company's reputation, and helps preserve relationships with customers, suppliers, and employees who might be negatively impacted by the "stigma" of bankruptcy. Bankruptcy filings are public records, requiring extensive financial disclosures.
Binding Power: This is a critical distinction. Workouts rely entirely on consensual agreement among the affected parties. A workout agreement cannot legally bind any creditor who does not consent (a "holdout"). These non-consenting creditors remain free to pursue their own legal remedies, such as lawsuits or foreclosure actions. Chapter 11, through the court's authority, allows a confirmed plan of reorganization to be imposed on all creditors within a class, provided certain legal standards are met, including binding dissenting minorities (the "cram-down" power).
Control: In a workout, company management typically retains more direct control over the business operations and the restructuring process itself. Chapter 11 involves oversight and potential influence from the bankruptcy court, the U.S. Trustee, and potentially official committees representing unsecured creditors or equity holders.
Legal Protections: Workouts do not offer the powerful legal protections afforded by bankruptcy. Most notably, they lack the "automatic stay," a legal injunction that immediately halts most creditor collection activities, lawsuits, and foreclosures upon a bankruptcy filing. Chapter 11 also provides specific mechanisms for debtors to reject burdensome contracts and leases (executory contracts) and to sell assets "free and clear" of existing liens and claims, which can be advantageous in certain situations.
It is important to recognize that out-of-court restructuring and formal bankruptcy are not always entirely separate paths.
They exist on a continuum. The potential outcomes and risks associated with a Chapter 11 filing often heavily inform and influence the negotiations during an out-of-court workout; bankruptcy serves as the baseline alternative against which workout proposals are measured.
Furthermore, companies often pursue workout negotiations while simultaneously developing a "pre-packaged" or "pre-negotiated" Chapter 11 plan. This dual-track approach provides leverage by discouraging creditors from holding out for a better deal (as a swift bankruptcy filing becomes a credible threat) and ensures the company is prepared to pivot quickly to a court-supervised process if a fully consensual out-of-court agreement proves unattainable.
This demonstrates a fluid relationship where strategies can blend or transition, rather than a strict dichotomy.
Recognizing the Need: Is Restructuring Right for Your Business?
(2) Common Distress Signals
Identifying financial or operational distress early is paramount for any business owner.
Ignoring warning signs can allow problems to deepen, potentially limiting options and ultimately forcing a company into a more difficult situation, such as liquidation or a disadvantageous bankruptcy.
Recognizing these signals allows for proactive intervention and consideration of strategic options like restructuring.
Key indicators span financial, operational, and strategic areas:
Financial Indicators
Persistent Cash Flow Problems: This is often the first and most critical sign. It manifests as a constant lack of cash to meet daily operational needs, difficulty covering payroll or regular expenses, consistently negative operating cash flow, or heavy reliance on overdraft facilities or fully drawn lines of credit. A cash runway of less than three months signals immediate danger requiring urgent action.
Declining Profitability and Margins: While sales volume might seem adequate, falling profit margins indicate that costs are too high relative to revenue, or that pricing power is eroding. As the adage goes, "turnover is vanity, profit is sanity". Consistent losses burn through cash quickly.
Increasing Debt Levels / High Leverage: An excessive debt burden relative to the company's earnings or assets is unsustainable. Signs include difficulty servicing debt (making interest and principal payments), debt growing faster than revenue, or a highly leveraged balance sheet.
Missed Payments and Defaults: An increasing frequency of missed or delayed payments to suppliers, lenders, or tax authorities (like HMRC in the UK) is a clear red flag. Defaulting on loan payments or formal arrangements is particularly damaging. The inability to make payroll is often a final, critical warning.
Loan Covenant Breaches: Violating the terms and conditions set forth in loan agreements, such as failing to meet minimum financial ratios (e.g., interest coverage, debt-to-equity) or other requirements, triggers defaults and allows lenders to take action.
Difficulty Accessing Capital/Credit: When lenders become wary, it's a sign of trouble. This can manifest as needing to provide stronger personal guarantees, facing higher interest rates on new borrowing, finding financing rounds taking longer than expected, or being denied credit altogether. A drop in business credit scores is also an indicator.
Worsening Credit Metrics: Key financial ratios deteriorating signal distress. Examples include a declining quick ratio (indicating weakening short-term liquidity) or a low or falling interest coverage ratio (EBITDA to interest expense), with levels below 2.0x often raising concern about the ability to service debt.
Weakening Overall Financial Position: This encompasses falling sales alongside falling profits, an inability for owners to draw a salary, or an overreliance on borrowed funds just to maintain day-to-day operations.
Operational & Strategic Indicators
Operational Inefficiencies: Problems in how the business runs, such as poor delivery performance, growing backlogs, excessive product rework or scrap rates, a disorganized shop floor, or reliance on outdated processes and technology, hinder profitability and competitiveness.
Inventory Issues: Inventory growing faster than sales suggests purchasing or production problems, poor cost accounting, or obsolescence. An imbalance – too much of the wrong stock and not enough of the right stock – indicates poor management. A gradual build-up of inventory can also signal slowing sales or operational issues.
Sales & Market Issues: A sustained decline in revenue or sales volume is a primary warning sign. Other indicators include a shrinking sales pipeline , loss of major customers or contracts , falling market share , an inability to compete effectively , or a failure to adapt to changing market trends, customer preferences, or technological disruptions. An increase in customer complaints or refund requests also signals problems.
Management & Workforce Issues: High employee turnover, especially among key management or financial personnel, can indicate internal instability or lack of confidence in the company's future. Low employee morale, difficulty filling critical positions, and a sense of constant 'firefighting' by management are also concerning. Lack of strategic focus, unclear vision, or reliance on a single individual for key decisions can point to underlying weaknesses.
Supplier & Creditor Issues: Relationships with suppliers and creditors deteriorating is a significant warning sign. This includes increasing pressure from creditors for payment, needing to stretch payment terms beyond normal limits, facing aggressive collection tactics, or experiencing changes in key suppliers.
Accounting & Reporting Issues: Delays in producing financial reports, statements that are difficult to understand, or questionable accounting practices (e.g., unusual adjustments, resistance to audits) can indicate attempts to mask problems or a lack of control. Frequent changes in auditors or auditors expressing concerns about the company's ability to continue "as a going concern" are serious red flags. Lack of up-to-date records makes it hard to know the true financial position.
Other Signs: Hastily selling off core business assets to raise cash , sudden deep cuts in product/service quality or employee perks , dramatic and poorly explained shifts in business strategy , unresolved legal problems or regulatory issues , or significant disputes with landlords, suppliers, or customers.
dAMAGING fEEDBACK lOOP
It's crucial to understand that these signals are rarely isolated. Financial distress and operational problems are deeply interconnected, often creating a damaging feedback loop.
For instance, poor cash flow forces delays in paying suppliers , which strains those vital relationships and can disrupt the supply chain. This operational disruption might lead to poor delivery performance , resulting in customer dissatisfaction and potentially lost sales.
The financial pressure also creates stress for management , potentially leading to poor strategic decisions or high employee turnover , which further weakens the company's ability to operate effectively.
This interconnectedness highlights why a successful restructuring often requires addressing both the financial symptoms (like excessive debt) and the underlying operational or strategic root causes (like inefficiency or poor market positioning). A purely financial fix without operational improvements may not lead to a sustainable recovery.
Strategic Levers: Reshaping Operations and Finances
When a business decides to pursue restructuring, it typically involves a combination of operational and financial strategies designed to stabilize the company and set it on a path to recovery.
These strategies are often interdependent; operational improvements can make financial restructuring more feasible and attractive to creditors, while financial adjustments can provide the resources and breathing room needed to implement operational changes.
(3) Operational Restructuring Strategies
Operational restructuring focuses on improving the core business activities, efficiency, and asset base to enhance profitability and cash generation. Key strategies include:
Cost Reduction Measures: This involves a systematic analysis of all expenditures to identify and eliminate unnecessary costs without compromising essential operations or future growth potential. Tactics can range from reducing overhead and renegotiating supplier contracts to eliminating redundant services or products and fostering a company-wide cost-conscious culture.
Process Optimization: This strategy aims to streamline workflows, eliminate waste and bottlenecks, and improve overall efficiency. Techniques may include implementing Lean principles, redesigning workflows, adopting new technologies, or automating manual tasks to boost productivity and reduce long-term operational costs.
Workforce Adjustments: Often a sensitive but necessary part of operational restructuring, this involves aligning the size and skills of the workforce with the company's current and future operational needs. This might entail layoffs ("downsizing" or "rightsizing"), redefining roles and responsibilities, consolidating functions, offering early retirement, or investing in retraining programs. Effective communication, legal compliance, and support for affected employees are critical during this process to manage morale and mitigate risks.
Divestiture of Non-Core Assets or Business Units: This involves selling off assets, subsidiaries, product lines, or entire business units that are underperforming, unprofitable, or no longer align with the company's core strategy. The proceeds from these sales can generate vital cash to pay down debt, fund ongoing operations, or reinvest in core areas. Divestiture helps streamline the company, allowing management to focus resources and attention on its most promising activities.
(4) Financial Restructuring Strategies
Financial restructuring directly targets the company's balance sheet, aiming to reduce the debt burden, improve liquidity, and create a sustainable capital structure. This is often the central element of an out-of-court workout. Common strategies include:
Negotiating with Creditors (Banks, Suppliers): This is the cornerstone of any workout. The company, often with advisors, engages directly with lenders and potentially key suppliers to seek modifications to existing debt terms. Common concessions sought include extending repayment periods or maturity dates (an "Amend and Extend" strategy) , reducing interest rates , obtaining temporary deferrals of payments (a moratorium or forbearance agreement) , or even achieving partial debt forgiveness or write-offs. Success requires transparency, presenting a credible turnaround plan, and often starting negotiations with the most powerful creditors, the secured lenders. Creditors may agree if they believe the workout offers a better recovery than a costly bankruptcy or if they have confidence in the company's turnaround prospects.
Debt Refinancing or Consolidation: This involves obtaining a new loan to pay off existing debts. Ideally, the new loan would have more favorable terms, such as a lower interest rate or a longer repayment period, although securing advantageous terms can be difficult for a distressed company. Consolidation involves combining multiple debts into a single, potentially more manageable loan.
Debt-for-Equity Swaps: In this transaction, a creditor agrees to cancel some or all of the debt owed to them in exchange for an ownership stake (equity) in the company. This directly reduces the company's debt load and aligns the interests of the former creditor (now shareholder) with the company's future success. However, it dilutes the ownership percentage of existing shareholders. These swaps are often employed when creditors believe the company has turnaround potential and the equity may become valuable, or as a way to avoid forcing the company into bankruptcy. The structure, valuation, and resulting ownership percentages are key negotiation points , and these transactions can have significant tax consequences, particularly regarding Cancellation of Debt Income (CODI).
Debt-for-Debt Swaps: This involves exchanging existing debt instruments for new ones with different characteristics. For example, a company might offer to exchange existing unsecured bonds for new bonds with a longer maturity date but potentially a higher interest rate or secured status (backed by collateral). Alternatively, unsecured debt holders might be offered secured debt with a lower principal amount, effectively moving them up in the repayment priority in exchange for reducing the total debt owed. This aims to alleviate near-term financial pressure while potentially improving the lender's position in the long run.
Securing New Equity Investment: Injecting fresh capital into the business by selling new shares. This can come from existing shareholders, often through a "rights offering" where they get the chance to buy new shares proportionally at a discount , or from new outside investors. New equity provides liquidity, can be used to pay down debt, and may be viewed more favorably by existing lenders than taking on more debt. However, it inevitably dilutes the ownership stake of existing shareholders.
Strategic Asset Sales: As mentioned under operational strategies, selling non-core or underperforming assets is also a key financial strategy to generate cash. The funds raised can be used directly for debt repayment or to support ongoing operations during the restructuring period. Careful assessment of asset value and market timing is crucial to maximize proceeds. It's worth noting that selling assets outside of bankruptcy may present challenges in conveying them "free and clear" of potential claims, a protection more readily available through a Section 363 sale in Chapter 11.
Other Techniques: Various other tools can be employed, including obtaining waivers from lenders for temporary covenant breaches , agreeing to convert cash interest payments to Payment-in-Kind (PIK) interest (which accrues to the principal balance, preserving cash short-term but increasing the total debt owed later) , negotiating standstill agreements where creditors pause collection efforts while a plan is developed , splitting existing notes into senior (A) and subordinated (B) portions (A/B notes) , or, if the company has cash, buying back its own debt at a discount in the open market.
Achieving creditor agreement often involves more than simply requesting concessions. A sophisticated negotiation strategy frequently employs a combination of incentives ('carrots') and tactical pressures ('sticks'). 'Carrots' might include offering creditors improved terms such as higher interest rates on restructured debt, upfront fees, additional collateral security, enhanced priority status, or even equity participation (like warrants) in the reorganized company. 'Sticks' could involve structuring transactions (like exchange offers) where non-participating creditors ('holdouts') see the terms of their existing debt significantly weakened (e.g., through 'exit consents' that strip covenants) , or leveraging the credible threat of a less favorable outcome for creditors in a potential bankruptcy filing if the workout fails. Business owners should understand that successful financial restructuring often requires this nuanced approach, offering inducements for cooperation while simultaneously creating disincentives for obstruction.
General Requirements (takes about 5-minutes or less to apply online)
680 FICO score (Transunion or Experian FICO model 8.0 or similar)
Less than -15% operating loss in the last year of business
Last 2-Years of filed Business Tax Returns; Last 1-Year of filed Personal Tax Returns
Last 3-months of bank statements; copy of Driver’s License
The Workout Process: A Path to Agreement
(5) Typical Stages
While the inherent flexibility of out-of-court restructuring means there isn't a rigid, mandated process like in Chapter 11, successful workouts typically follow a logical sequence of stages :
Stage 1: Initial Assessment & Diagnosis: This foundational stage involves a deep and objective analysis of the company's situation. It requires evaluating financial health (liquidity position, solvency, cash flow analysis, asset/liability review), operational performance, and market standing. Critically, this stage must identify the root causes of the distress, not just the symptoms. A key determination is whether the underlying business is viable and capable of being turned around, and whether an out-of-court solution is realistically achievable given the creditor landscape and complexity. A crucial part of this assessment is determining the company's liquidity "runway" – how long it can sustain operations while negotiations take place. Insufficient liquidity often forces a company into bankruptcy regardless of other factors. This stage frequently necessitates engaging external financial advisors or turnaround consultants for their expertise and objectivity.
Stage 2: Developing the Restructuring Plan: Based on the assessment, a detailed, credible, and achievable restructuring plan is formulated. This plan outlines both the proposed operational changes (e.g., cost reductions, efficiency improvements, divestitures) and the specific financial restructuring terms being sought from creditors (e.g., debt modifications, debt-for-equity swaps, new capital infusions). The plan must demonstrate a clear and believable path back to financial stability and sustainable profitability. It typically includes detailed financial projections (cash flow forecasts, projected income statements, and balance sheets) to support its viability. The plan needs to be compelling enough to convince creditors that supporting it is preferable to the alternatives, like bankruptcy.
Stage 3: Negotiation with Key Stakeholders: This is the core interactive phase of the workout. The company, guided by its advisors, engages in discussions with its critical stakeholders. Negotiations typically commence with the senior secured lenders (banks), as their agreement is often a prerequisite for broader support. Discussions then extend to unsecured creditors (major suppliers) and potentially equity holders or investors. Transparency is crucial; companies generally need to share detailed financial information and the restructuring plan to facilitate informed negotiations. In situations with multiple lenders or bondholders, creditors may form ad hoc committees, often represented by their own legal and financial advisors (whose fees may be covered by the debtor company as an inducement to engage). This stage involves intensive back-and-forth negotiation over the plan's terms until, ideally, a consensus is reached. Once a tentative agreement is reached, creditors are usually given a defined, often short, period to formally accept the proposed workout plan.
Stage 4: Implementation & Monitoring: Once the necessary agreements are secured, the company executes the operational and financial changes outlined in the restructuring plan. This requires diligent management and may involve ongoing communication and reporting to stakeholders. Continuous monitoring of the company's performance against the plan's projections and milestones is essential, allowing for adjustments if circumstances change or results deviate.
The early stages of this process – the initial assessment and the subsequent negotiation with senior lenders – are often the most critical determinants of success. A realistic, data-driven assessment of the company's viability and available liquidity is fundamental.
Without sufficient cash to operate during negotiations, the out-of-court path may be closed from the start. Equally vital is the ability to reach an initial understanding or agreement, often in the form of a forbearance or standstill agreement, with the primary secured lender(s).
If the company cannot gain the cooperation of its most senior and powerful creditors early on, achieving a broader consensus with other, often more numerous and diverse, stakeholders becomes exceedingly difficult, if not impossible. Therefore, successfully navigating these initial hurdles is paramount for the workout process to have a realistic chance of succeeding.
VI. Weighing the Options: Advantages of Out-of-Court Restructuring
(6) Key Benefits
For business owners facing distress, the prospect of an out-of-court workout often presents several compelling advantages over a formal Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing. These benefits collectively contribute to a potentially less disruptive and more value-preserving path forward:
Lower Costs: This is perhaps the most frequently cited advantage. Workouts typically involve significantly lower legal, court, administrative, and professional advisory fees compared to the extensive requirements of Chapter 11. The cost savings can be substantial, potentially running into millions of dollars for larger companies.
Speed and Efficiency: Out-of-court processes are generally much faster than formal bankruptcy proceedings. This speed is crucial for companies operating with limited cash reserves, allowing them to implement turnaround strategies and stabilize finances more quickly.
Confidentiality and Privacy: Negotiations occur privately, away from public view. This avoids the public disclosure of financial distress and sensitive business information that is mandatory in bankruptcy, thereby minimizing potential damage to the company's reputation and brand image. It also helps protect the company from competitors who might seek to exploit the situation.
Flexibility and Tailored Solutions: The workout process is contractual and less bureaucratic, allowing for greater flexibility in negotiating creative and customized solutions that fit the specific circumstances of the company and its creditors. The debtor retains more "free will" to propose and implement different strategies.
Maintaining Management Control: Unlike Chapter 11, where the court and potentially creditor committees exert significant oversight, management typically retains greater control over the day-to-day operations and the direction of the restructuring process in a workout.
Preserving Business Relationships & Reputation: The collaborative and less adversarial nature of a workout helps maintain goodwill and preserve valuable relationships with key stakeholders, including creditors, suppliers, customers, and employees. Avoiding the "bankruptcy stigma" can prevent erosion of customer confidence and supplier nervousness. It can also help safeguard employee morale, which can suffer during public distress. Successfully achieving an out-of-court agreement can also signal that creditors retain trust and confidence in the management team and the company's prospects.
These advantages are not isolated but rather interconnected and mutually reinforcing. The speed and efficiency of a workout directly contribute to its lower cost. The privacy afforded by the process is instrumental in preserving business relationships and reputation , which in turn can foster a more cooperative environment conducive to flexible negotiations and maintaining management control.
This flexibility allows for tailored solutions that might be agreed upon more quickly. Taken together, the combination of speed, cost savings, confidentiality, and flexibility creates an environment that supports the preservation of relationships and control, making the workout an attractive alternative – provided the central challenge of achieving creditor consensus can be overcome.
Potential Hurdles: Risks and Challenges of Workouts
(7) Navigating the Downsides
Despite the significant advantages, out-of-court restructuring is not a guaranteed path to success and carries substantial risks and challenges that business owners must carefully consider.
The Need for Creditor Consensus (The Holdout Problem): This is arguably the single greatest challenge. Workouts are voluntary and rely on achieving agreement – often near-unanimity – among all critical creditors whose rights are being modified. A single significant creditor, or a small group, refusing to consent (acting as a "holdout") can effectively veto the entire restructuring plan and derail the process. Creditors might hold out hoping for better individual treatment, or they may adopt a "free-rider" stance, refusing to make concessions while benefiting from the improved financial health resulting from other creditors' sacrifices.
Limited Binding Power and Lack of Automatic Stay: Because workouts are consensual, they only legally bind the parties who agree to the terms. Non-consenting creditors retain their full legal rights and can continue collection efforts, initiate lawsuits, or pursue foreclosure actions against the company's assets. The absence of the automatic stay, which halts such actions in bankruptcy, leaves the company vulnerable during the negotiation period.
Complexity with Numerous or Dispersed Creditors: Achieving the necessary consensus becomes exponentially more difficult as the number and diversity of creditors increase. Companies with complex capital structures involving multiple layers of debt, or those with publicly traded bonds held by numerous, often unidentified and constantly changing investors, face significant hurdles in coordinating negotiations and securing agreement. Negotiating with dispersed public debtholders who may be unwilling to become restricted from trading complicates information sharing and achieving timely consensus.
Risk of Failure Leading to Bankruptcy: If workout negotiations break down, if key creditors refuse to consent, or if the implemented workout plan ultimately fails to stabilize the business, the company may have no choice but to file for bankruptcy. In such cases, the time, effort, and financial resources expended on the attempted workout might be lost, potentially leaving the company in an even weaker position (e.g., with less liquidity) as it enters the formal bankruptcy process.
Inability to Address Certain Issues Effectively: Workouts are generally most effective for addressing balance sheet problems, primarily by restructuring financial debt. They are less suited for resolving deep-seated operational issues that might require the powerful tools available only in bankruptcy, such as the ability to reject unfavorable leases or burdensome contracts. Workouts also struggle to deal effectively with significant "legacy liabilities" like large litigation judgments, underfunded pension obligations, or complex labor agreements. Furthermore, selling assets "free and clear" of liens and claims is more challenging and potentially riskier for buyers outside of the bankruptcy court's protective framework. Additionally, the tax treatment of certain restructuring outcomes, such as the preservation of Net Operating Losses (NOLs) or the handling of Cancellation of Debt Income (CODI), may be less advantageous in an out-of-court setting compared to Chapter 11.
An inherent tension exists within the workout process itself. The very characteristics that make workouts appealing – their speed, lower cost, flexibility, and reliance on consensus rather than court orders – are also the sources of their primary vulnerability: the difficulty in achieving that consensus without the coercive tools of bankruptcy.
This difficulty naturally increases with the complexity of the debt structure and the number of creditor constituencies involved. This dynamic underscores why workouts tend to be most feasible for companies with relatively simpler capital structures, fewer key creditors, and reasonably strong existing relationships with those creditors.
It also highlights the critical role of skilled negotiation and professional guidance in bridging the gaps and overcoming the inherent challenges of achieving voluntary agreement among parties with potentially divergent interests.
VIII. Seeking Expertise: The Importance of Professional Guidance
(8) Why You Shouldn't Go It Alone
Navigating the complexities of corporate restructuring, whether in or out of court, is a high-stakes endeavor fraught with financial, operational, and legal challenges. Attempting to manage this process without experienced professional guidance is highly inadvisable and significantly increases the risk of failure or suboptimal outcomes. Engaging qualified advisors early is crucial for developing a viable strategy, executing it effectively, mitigating risks, and maximizing the chances of a successful turnaround. Key professionals bring distinct but complementary expertise:
Role of Financial Advisors / Investment Bankers: These advisors focus primarily on the financial aspects of the restructuring. Their responsibilities typically include conducting a thorough assessment of the company's financial situation, developing detailed financial models and projections, evaluating restructuring alternatives, advising on the optimal capital structure, performing business and asset valuations, arranging new debt or equity financing (including refinancing), structuring and negotiating the terms of financial instruments (like debt-for-equity swaps), managing asset sale processes (potentially running auctions), negotiating directly with creditors on financial terms, and providing fairness opinions or expert testimony if required. Whether advising the debtor or creditors, their goal is typically to maximize financial value or recovery for their client.
Role of Turnaround Specialists / Consultants (including Chief Restructuring Officers - CROs): These professionals concentrate on the operational health and recovery of the business. They conduct deep operational assessments to identify root causes of underperformance and inefficiencies. They develop and implement practical turnaround plans, focusing on improving profitability and cash flow management, rightsizing operations, enhancing reporting accuracy and timeliness, and potentially renegotiating supplier agreements. Turnaround consultants often work hands-on within the company, sometimes taking on interim management roles (like CEO, CFO, or CRO) to drive change directly. They play a crucial role in bridging the gap between operational realities and financial strategies, improving communication with stakeholders like lenders, and rebuilding credibility. They are often engaged early in the process when operational issues are significant.
Role of Legal Counsel: Experienced restructuring lawyers are essential for navigating the complex legal landscape. They assess legal risks and implications associated with the company's distress and proposed restructuring actions. They advise on the legal structuring of the workout, draft and negotiate all necessary legal agreements (including forbearance agreements, loan amendments, workout plans, debt exchange documents, asset purchase agreements), ensure compliance with relevant laws and regulations (contract law, UCC, potentially securities law), and advise management and the board on their fiduciary duties during distress. They play a key role in negotiation strategy and represent the company in discussions with creditors and their counsel. Should the workout fail or disputes arise, they handle potential litigation. Their expertise and credibility are vital for achieving a legally sound and enforceable agreement.
Business owners must recognize that the restructuring process often involves an ecosystem of advisors, not just their own. Creditors, particularly institutional lenders or groups of bondholders, will typically engage their own legal and financial advisors to represent their interests during negotiations. While the goal of a workout is collaboration, each advisory team has a primary duty to its own client. Advisors bring expertise, but they also operate based on incentives that may differ from those of the company's management.
This underscores the importance for the business owner to hire highly skilled advisors who are clearly aligned with the company's objectives. It also highlights a potential cost factor, as the distressed company is often expected to cover the reasonable professional fees of the creditors' advisory teams as a condition of their engagement in the workout process. Understanding this dynamic landscape of potentially competing advisory interests is crucial for navigating the negotiation process effectively.
Restructuring as a Tool for Renewal
Out-of-court restructuring, or a workout, presents a valuable strategic alternative for fundamentally viable businesses grappling with financial or operational distress. By facilitating direct negotiation and consensual agreement with key creditors outside the formal court system, it offers a potentially faster, less costly, more confidential, and more flexible path compared to Chapter 11 bankruptcy.
However, the success of a workout hinges critically on early recognition of distress signals and proactive intervention. Delaying action invariably narrows the available options and weakens the company's negotiating position. The process demands transparency, a credible turnaround plan addressing both financial and operational issues, and the ability to achieve consensus among crucial stakeholders, particularly secured lenders.
Given the complexities involved – from financial modeling and operational diagnostics to intricate legal negotiations and managing diverse stakeholder interests – attempting an out-of-court restructuring without expert guidance is perilous. Engaging experienced financial advisors, turnaround consultants, and legal counsel early in the process is not merely advisable; it is often essential for navigating the challenges, mitigating risks, and achieving a successful outcome.
While the path of restructuring is demanding, requiring difficult decisions and concerted effort, a well-planned and skillfully executed out-of-court workout can be transformative. It can alleviate crippling debt burdens, streamline operations, restore creditor confidence, and ultimately set the stage for renewed financial stability and a sustainable future.
For business owners committed to preserving their enterprise, restructuring should be viewed not just as a response to crisis, but as a powerful tool for resilience, strategic repositioning, and long-term renewal.
General Requirements (takes about 5-minutes or less to apply online)
680 FICO score (Transunion or Experian FICO model 8.0 or similar)
Less than -15% operating loss in the last year of business
Last 2-Years of filed Business Tax Returns; Last 1-Year of filed Personal Tax Returns
Last 3-months of bank statements; copy of Driver’s License
We can help you Navigate through the Small Business Financing maze.
The sooner you act, the more options you’ll have.
Schedule a consultation today and take the first step toward saving your business and your future.
Remember, more business debt isn’t the answer. A more effective business strategy is.
Click to setup an introduction meeting to discuss your situation and next best steps.
Bernarsky Advisors
Business Finance and Strategy Advice
Refinance. Restructure. Reorganize.
(See more of our articles about Business Finance and Strategy below…)
WHAT IS THE BEST AND SAFEST WAY FOR YOUR BUSINESS TO DEAL WITH HIGH BUSINESS DEBT PAYMENTS?
It is NOT by stopping ACH payments.
It is NOT by taking on another business loan.
It is NOT ALWAYS a Refinancing
It is NOT by entering into a debt settlement program.
Find out the BEST strategies to get your Business back to where it was
Setup a meeting with a business finance & strategy expert to discuss all of your options!
Read some other recent Business Finance and Business Strategy articles:
